Democratic Underground - Flight 93 - Why such a bad conspiracy?

Flight 93 - Why such a bad conspiracy? [View All]

Realityhack

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Apr-04-09 09:32 AM
Original message

Flight 93 - Why such a bad conspiracy?

Advertisements [?]

There is a VERY long thread here on flight 93 in which many people have claimed that there is not enough debris for a full size aircraft, that it would not have impeded itself in the ground, and that this is a dead giveaway that the entire crash was faked.

So let me ask this. Assuming that some group wanted to fake this crash (for the love of god please leave out who), and assuming for some inexplicable reason they decided not to do so by just crashing a jet there...

Why the hell would they leave less debris than expected? If they can pull off the cover up from DNA samples, to FDR, to the debris that was found, to the phone calls, etc. etc.

Why the hell wouldn't they plant most of a plane?

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

Flight 93 - Why such a bad conspiracy? [View All]