Reply #114: Well, you're still avoiding the question, but

[LARED]

you are wrong about the presence of any photographic evidence that flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. If you had any, it would have been provided a long time ago.

Also, exactly what type of logic or reasoning tells you that lack of photographic evidence strengthens your position that something other than flight 77 hit the Pentagon. Never mind that there is quite a bit of photographic evidence that flight 77 did indeed impact the Pentagon, but you believe it is tainted. Your choice.

But you can't have it both ways and be rational. If you don't like the available evidence and choose to ignore it, you can't then wave your arms in the air and say you have photographic evidence that a Boeing did not hit the Pentagon without producing it.