Reply #2: I did write 'em--they say explosives are "sensitive"

[Dancing_Dave]

I wrote a while back, and the response I got from the NIST is that explosives are to "sensitive" to comment on now. More evidence of cover-up and limits on official government funded investigations. They can't get away with bringing the explosions into the discusion now without risking their funding...at best, they can try to avoid some of the non-sense that came from trying to explain what happened without taking those explosions into account. They let us know that they can't get official access to the transcripts of first-responder tesimony where we know the evidence of explosions would be, because some of those first-responders discretely posted it on the web. That should let you know where a limit is being imposed.

The NIST is being so diplomatic, that it's hard to get any definate message from 'em. Any interpretation is bound to seem debateable. I think if you read the whole report of the research they've done so far, you will realize that the general ultra-diplomatic stuff about "no hypothesis eliminated" doesn't mean that they think think that the truss theory is much of a live option any more. I think if you have some feeling for the pressures and limits they expressing themselves under, you will realize that they've given as clear a signal as they could indicating that their reasearch really hasn't supported the truss theory that is so convenient to those now in power.

In spite of all that, I think they are trying to do a better job than FEMA, whose investigation a professional fireman's magazine called a "half-baked farce". I forewarded the study to PlaguePuppy because it might be worthwhile to cross-reference some of their information with what's going on in the ever-increasing number of independent studies that are breaking free of the limits imposed on U.S. Government funded investigations. There is real progress being made in the un-official voluntary research of concerned intelligent citizens around the world, people with all different kinds of areas of expertise needed to figure out what really happened. It's high time we all gave up on being narrow-minded, prejudiced, and mind-controlled, and checked out the full variety of sites where the needed progress is happening.