You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: I think you and I have "discussed" this before. I know we don't agree but [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I think you and I have "discussed" this before. I know we don't agree but
Edited on Thu Mar-30-06 03:55 PM by file83
the "cover up" isn't as difficult as you may think, as long as each component of the conspiracy was properly "compartmentalized". Some of the more "out there" ideas such as swapped planes with missing passengers I agree would be nearly impossible to cover up.

But placing charges in the buildings would be an easy one. You just make them think that they are "protecting" national security or saving lives or preventing more "unnecessary" deaths.

"But sir, why are we rigging these towers?"

"Because in the event that a terrorist successfully compromises the building, we can't risk having the building "fall over" laterally across 3 city blocks. Tens of thousands of people could die. We must evacuate as many people as possible, but in order to save MORE lives, we may have to sacrifice a few thousand to bring the building down, as a safety measure."

"What about WTC 7, why are we rigging that?"

"That building houses, Secret Service & CIA offices. If that building has to EVER be completely evacuated, then for reasons of National Security, we must bring the building down. We can't afford to have the enemy infiltrate those unoccupied offices."

So on and so on. The hijackers too, would have NO CLUE they were being allowed to get away with their terror plot. They would have no idea that FBI investigations into their terrorist cell were being diverted. As far as they knew, they were going to hijack some planes. Whether they flew the planes themselves or the planes were being remotely piloted by "UAV techonolgy", remains debated.

All the other aspects of this conspiracy are easily compartmentalized as well, and so, don't require MUCH of a cover up because all the participants THINK they know something the public doesn't know: that what they did was "good" for the country.

The small group at the top of this plan, the group "in the know" of the big picture are the ones that WANTED and were MOTIVATED and would BENEFIT from the conspiracy. They remain silent for obvious reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC