You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: Happy to oblige [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
RayUbinger Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Happy to oblige
> Please post more often about your theory that the FDNY was complicit in what you call a "snuff film"

By snuff film I mean a foreknowledge-enabled video of a murder. Since you evidently believe instead that Jules Naudet's famous 1st Hit impact shot was made possible by 69 simultaneous COINCIDENCES (see the list at
http://911foreknowledge.com/staged.htm
)
then I think it's fair to ask, how many simultaneous coincidences WOULD be enough make you suspicious, if 69 aren't? Would 70 be enough? 71? 171? 1,000,071? How many?

If 70 would be enough, here's a 70th: the Naudets had a SECOND camera running at the instant of the FIRST Hit, specifically to capture pedestrian reaction at that instant:
http://911foreknowledge.com/bravenewworld.htm
and they LIED about that second cameraman's whereabouts at that instant, by saying (not showing) that he was still back at the firehouse.


> and please post more often about your theory that firefighters shot, stabbed or otherwise murdered people in the towers on 9/11 for no apparent reason but to be part of this imaginary "snuff film"

What's your alternate explanation of the existence of Mr. Backofhead's vigorous right-arm thrust at the space where they about to "find" Father Judge dead?
http://911foreknowledge.com/judge.htm
Mouth to mouth resuscitation by punching??
Also feel free to share how you think there got to be TWO videos of that arm-thrust when the narration claims there was only ONE camera (Jules Naudet's) there?

And what's this sharply pointed unsegmented metal rod that they shot an inexplicable close-up of in that same scene?



> and please post more often about how you're so sure of this because, according to you, NY firefighters don't wear black helmets and therefore those wearing black hats were really military types and not firefighters.

Straw man. I've never posted anything about helmets being black. But there are two Naudet video clips of a guy with an army-style helmet:
http://911foreknowledge.com/soldier.htm
http://911foreknowledge.com/soldier3.htm

And at the bottom of
http://911foreknowledge.com/soldier2.htm
there's a flack-vested dude with a holstered sidearm leaving the WTC1 lobby as the first firemen arrive.


What other aspects of Naudet foreknowledge would you like me to talk more about?
Tony Benetatos the fake FDNY rookie, perhaps, and how he's never seen doing a lick of firefighting anywhere in the whole movie, and how the Naudets faked his attendance at the September 1, 2001 funeral of real FDNY rookie Michael Gorumba?


Ray Ubinger
http://911foreknowledge.com
Naudet 911: The Art of the Mock-You-Drama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC