Reply #22: "No-planers" in the 9/11 Truth Movement need to think just a little . . .

[Klimmer]

I'm all for looking at all possibilities, but when the evidence is overwhelming and without a doubt, then you just need to drop it. Evidence that invalidates a hypothesis or theory, then does just that --- it invalidates it. Time to move on and look at what the evidence does support. That is the way science works.

The "No-plane" theories have got to be a decoy to confuse the weak minded, and people in the 9-11 Truth movement have fallen for so obviously a boon-dogle and major false lead.

Two very large jet aircraft did indeed hit the WTC Towers 1 and 2. Now were they the actual passenger flights we have been told they were or were they replaced with similar make and model RC drones or other similar jet aircraft but different? Now, that is all to be determined.

But to pursue "No-plane" theory just makes the 9-11 Truth Movement look just a tad silly, and that I believe is it's intention. Move on people to what the evidence does support.