Reply #117: If other, better evidence was overwhelming, why did NIST rely on

[mhatrw]

any eyewitness interviews at all? And since they did rely on numerous eyewitness interviews to determine their pre-collapse WTC-7 damage and fire assessments, why would they exclude any and all evidence concerning the very reason the entire FDNY supposedly agreed the WTC-7 was going to collpase hours before it did -- namely, that WTC-7 was (supposedly) visibly leaning and bulging for most of the afternoon before it collapsed?

Just stop arguing for just a second, slow down, use your brain, and consider the huge ramifications that any such observations would have for any putative collapse explanation. Now tell us again, why did both FEMA and NIST ignore any and all testimony concerning the supposed leaning and bulging of WTC-7?