Reply #338: Petgoat....

[SDuderstadt]

I'm not going to go down the whole list and debunk the quotes one by one. But I'd be glad to debunk more of them just to show you how stupid they are. More importantly, what I am doing is perfectly valid from an evidentiary standpoint. As a matter of fact, you're further undermining your own claims again. You acknowledge that I can easily debunk the lead-off quotes. It's not statistically significant, but one can surmise that if you don't have to delve deep into the list before you run into bogus/unsubstantiated/clipped quotes, it's probably not likely the rest are too reliable.

Even worse, you admit the problem with the Robertson quote. If you knew about it, then why in the world would you offer it as evidence? You are either incredibly lazy or, as I have often maintained, you are stunningly intellectually dishonest. Or both. With you, it's hard to tell where one leaves off and the other begins.

Unsolicited hint: If you want to be taken more seriously, it's probably best not to offer hopelessly biased sites like www.governmentterror.com as "evidence". If you need more examples of how off the mark or wrong the quotes are, let me know. How many examples do you need before you click to the fact that you've been duped, Petgoat? 5? 10? 15? 20? 200?