Reply #136: You don't understand.

[petgoat]

I'll stipulate for the sake of discussion that explosives were used
to bring the towers down.

But I dispute the notion that the use of explosives proves BFEE complicity.
It could have been incompetence on the part of the security company.

Most people are unwilling to consider the possibility of explosives because
they assume it would require BFEE complicity.

I maintain that the explosives question (howdunnit) must be considered on its
own merits, quite separate from whodunnit.

Linking explosives to the BFEE is a logical leap that is not justified based on
the data we have, and prevents a dispassionate review of the evidence we have
(since the best evidence, like Kennedy's brain, seems to have disappeared).