You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: I watch word use fairly carefully and have felt the someone would [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. I watch word use fairly carefully and have felt the someone would
Edited on Tue May-30-06 08:32 PM by libertypirate
be trying to shot the 9-11 truth revolution in the foot the last couple of months.

It is unlikely that if what Citizen Spook says is true; Hopsicker is the only mole lurking. Any cumulative perception built by the corporate press requires someone to make claims that would be difficult to prove. Such claims that lack rock hard-on evidence can easily be interpreted in multiple ways. Anyone who attempts to assert evidence that is open to interpretation is not a friend to 9-11 truth, they are deluding the truth. We should identify them and expose their disingenuous methods, by calling them out publicly.

I don't care if they are even part right at this point with nearly half the population waking up, no one who really wants to get to the bottom of this hell should be trying to go beyond what the scientists have already been able to prove. A credible person would not want to delude their research.


This seems to be a pretty obvious a wild goose chase...


http://www.911blogger.com/2006/05/911-whistleblower-andrew-grove-comes.html

At this time in the 9-11 truth revolution this man stands up to inform us that the situation is much worse then we need to prove our case. Although his story is compelling he spends most of his statement informing us about himself and how his actions have affected his life. Credibility doesn’t start with playing the victim, it starts with self sacrifice, and you are not sacrificing if you have already lost everything as he says that he has.

If I had information that I wanted to share with the American public I would use the excellent work, the factual scientific work of others as a sounding board for my own evidence thus both enforcing my own credibility and that of a growing movement. Credibility is a valuable commodity when sharing information with the public. At this time for the 9-11 truth movement to have to step back to re-establish credibility would be the same as denying the credibility already attained; which only can harm an already strong community and effort.

P.S. Movements die revolutions, revolt, evolve and find solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC