You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What was so wrong with what Howard Dean said?? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 06:01 PM
Original message
What was so wrong with what Howard Dean said??
Advertisements [?]
I just saw a clip of him. He said (paraphrasing), "they say stay in, yeah, we heard this during Vietnam--'just another year', they kept saying. And then 25,000 more dead. And it wasn't winnable, and we didn't win, etc."

HE'S F**KING RIGHT, for God's sake!!!!

Who here is in Dean's age range? I'm betting most of you are younger than he, and I am younger, too, but unlike some of you, I was alive during the latter part of Vietnam.

I was a child, but since Vietnam pervaded our culture, I heard a lot about it. Bits and pieces: "Catch 22", a book I didn't really find all that funny, b/c I was a child; M*A*S*H the movie, which was technically about Korea but was really a commentary about Vietnam in many ways; the music--I could go on and on about that; Norman Mailer; long-haired people in huge crowds in protest;Kent state; "Make love, not war"; "Mad" magazine's handy dandy guide for avoiding being drafted ("Avoid the draft! Wear pink underwear!"); trying to recognize the names of places as they showed them on TV on the news, on little maps: the best I did was to know the names of Saigon and Hanoi and the dreaded Mekong delta; a nightmare of my draft-age brother's military funeral (he didn't die in the war, I just dreamed he died in it)...

I remember it.

Howard Dean is right. This is Vietnam; everyone knows this in their heart, if they are old enough to remember Vietnam. Howard Dean is right.

And still, still... the subtext is never, never mentioned: we aren't staying in Iraq to "not let down the Iraqi people"; we aren't staying in Iraq to "nurse a new democratic government". WE ARE IN IRAQ BECAUSE IF WE LEFT RIGHT NOW, SOMEBODY'S PROFITS WOULD TAKE A HUGE HIT. That is the ONLY true reason certain people in power are arguing against leaving.

Chris Matthews, the savvy and astute political commentator, expressed the two sides as: those who want us to get out, and those who want us to have a democracy in Iraq.

Chris Matthews and his ilk are out of touch with the PEOPLE of America. Down here among the PEOPLE, the division is between those of us who want us the fuck out of there, period, and those who want us to stay in b/c they think staying in will somehow save face for their leader, George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC