You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #157: Oh puh-lease [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #145
157. Oh puh-lease
The bullshit lies about Clark and his position on the IWR have been put to bed a million times. You've made it clear by posting them over and over that don't want to accept the truth, so I'm not gonna beat that dead horse again.

But as a veteran, I want to address your last line: "So many in the military have personal issues with General Clark." It was the attack Edwards released thru his press secretary, but it's a lie. You can count on one hand the number of military officers who criticized Clark based first-hand knowledge and on an attribution basis. One (Shelton) was shilling for Edwards, and refused to say one word more against him after that little fact was revealed. One was a rather undistinguished (so much so I can't remember his name) 3-star who was passed over for promotion because the job in Panama went to Clark. The third one (Franks) is a die-hard Repub who endorsed Bush, and the other (Funk) was his good buddy and probably a Repub as well. When the truth came out about Shelton, Schwartzkopf immediately retracted what he said, saying it was based completely on Shelton and that he never knew Clark. Finally, there was an Air Force four-star whose name escapes me but who endorsed Dean and then Kerry, but he had to admit he never knew Clark either; he had retired many years before Clark moved to the Joint Staff.

You think the Repubs can't dig up four people out of anyone's background to say whatever the RNC tells 'em to? Especially when they get help from other Democrats?

I could give you quotes from dozens of generals who did know Clark, liked him just fine, and didn't mind saying so on the record. Just from memory ('cause frankly, you're not worth the effort to dig up old sources): McAffrey, with whom he served in DC, called him a national treasure. Shalikashvili, who was his boss for four years, had nothing but praise. Colin Powell, when pressed, had to admit Clark is "one of the finest officer I've ever known." Jimmy Johnson, one of a handful of black 4-star contemporaries, endorsed and campaigned with him. Of the twelve generals who appeared for Kerry at the convention, almost half of 'em had endorsed Clark first. Shelton was certainly nowhere to be seen.

There are lots more, but I prefer the endorsements of the ordinary soldiers--the enlisted, NCOs and junior officers--who never make the newsprint or airwaves. They're the ones who felt the effects of Clark's leadership up close and personal, many in combat, and they literally flocked to Clark's campaign. And they'll be back if he decides to run again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC