Reply #20: If only I could thank you for the assumptions

[DerekG]

1. Support has nothing to do with it. Malcolm X merely preferred the certainty, over that which was ersatz. It's a dilemma often faced by the disadvantaged and impoverished: Who's more dangerous, the chest-thumper, or the back-stabber? (Tell me: Would you include Johnson's tacit approval of the FBI's war on Rev. King, and McNamara's Project 100,000 "Moron Corps", in that noble Texan's civil rights legacy?)

2. Actually, I think we'd be well served to attack both groups, until my two senators, Gog (Schumer) and Magog (Clinton), cease supporting and funding this goddamn war. Laugh all you want, but there's something about the burning of children that makes me hanker for zealous opposition.

3. If Cockburn, Franks, and Goff are indeed in the employ of the empire, they've gone about it the wrong way. One can play the part of fascist-enabler within the DLC, and have far more lucrative prospects...