You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #133: No it doesn't, because their IS no evidence. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Ken Burch

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-07-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #127

133. No it doesn't, because their IS no evidence.

Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 04:50 PM by Ken Burch

There are a couple of meaningless coincidences. There is no conspiracy.

If you want to watch out for REAL conspiracies, I suggest you keep an eye on Diebold and what
they do to the vote counting. Your enemy is the RIGHT, not the left. It's corporate power, not activists.

Democrats don't gain from treating
progressives as the enemy. Clinton was only good for Clinton. And YOU should only post when sober. So there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.