Reply #8: I think Vanity Fair hesitates to spell out specifics ..

[radio4progressives]

because they don't personally wish do the job for prosecuters. But in the very least, to be credible, they have to at least mention Democrats in general terms. If prosecuters don't go after these Dems, then either because their is no crime committed - or there is no "there - there"...

but for any of us to protest the mentioning of Dems involved with lobbyist is really being rediculously naive - Dems were up to their ears and necks in this stuff forever - and still are - just because Dems aren't in the majority - don't make them saints on this issue. c'mon people!

Vanity Fair problably knows a lot more damaging information and are giving us a break - if that's the case - then the very least they needed to do for credibility is to at least mention what has already been reported in other publications.

take off those rose colored glasses, and start looking at everybody in washington with a much more critical eye - after all we've been through, witnessed and learned, one thing should stand out to everyone and that is we have too few friends in Congress. (friends of the working class, ordinary citizens)...