|
>Easy, it was explained dozens of times. Iraq's connection to 9/11 was that >9/11 caused a re-think concerning continuing threats facing the US. After >9/11 there was one power that had been at war with the US and the UN, had >continued to fire at US/UK aircraft nearly every day, was breaking the >cease-fire and a dozen UNSCRs, was harboring numerous terrorists and >terrorists organizations, had an intelligence network that had attempted to >kill a US president and killed numerous critics overseas, and that had to >change. It's called connecting the dots and reaching a conclusion. The >same people that were screaming "why didn't they connect the dots" after >Sept 11, have spent every day since trying to prevent the US from collecting >the dots, telling the terrorists what dots we are looking for, and >alternating between saying Iran is a bigger threat and Iran is no threat. > >Iraq wasn't about "an imminent threat" and it wasn't sold as "being a day at >the beach." Both were specifically warned were not the case. These two >canards are post hoc strawmen commie-libs began using before Saddam was even >captured. > >You can stop pretending you would support America if someone else was in >charge. > >You didn't sprain your ankle dancing in the streets after Sept 11 did you?
|