You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: Perhaps because EE was the attack dog in this scenario. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Perhaps because EE was the attack dog in this scenario.
I do recall Bill got alot of shit for performing that role early in the campaign dealing with Obama and Hillary's war votes in the Senate.

What I question is the campaign tactical wisom of having a candidate who is lampooned as girly having his wife as his attack dog while at the same time claiming he is the better President for women.

Was it the worry of backlash if it was Edwards himself who attacked her on women's issues?

I just don't understand the mindset there.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC