|
Edited on Mon Jul-30-07 09:41 AM by Skip Intro
have distorted what she said - they claimed she said she wouldn't meet with our adversaries, in her answer at the debate, and that is just not true. Yesterday I read that they are trying to use a clip of her saying we should talk to our enemies as proof that she has flip/flopped with her debate answer, while it is just not true - there are no conflicts with that clip (from an msnbc interview) and her debate answer. The Obama camp has made a false charge, and then tried to pile on as if their false charge were actually true. I saw a you-tube video evidently from his campaign that was put out a day or two after the debate where they showed clips from the debate - showed Hillary's answer and his answer, but completely cut out the part where he answered, without hesitation, that "I would" meet with those leaders in his first year.
I am not a groupie for any of the candidates (tho I could quickly become one for Gore) and hadn't really held a strong opinion of Obama either way. But if he's going to use misleading statements and misrepresentations to reach his goals then I really have to wonder if I would even vote for him in the general, should he win the nom.
Eight years of misleading statements from the WH is enough.
|