You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #51: Well, the "or" construct is yours. I used "to" which is close enough to 'and' [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Well, the "or" construct is yours. I used "to" which is close enough to 'and'
But here's the bottom line--it isn't so hard to explain. Two or three sentences would clear up the mystery, and no one would be forced to suppose anything.

But that hasn't happened. We hear "reports" from people who heard something from people who are supposedly associated with the campaign, but nothing from the candidate.

How tough is it to say "I couldn't make it BECAUSE............."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC