You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #6: It would seem to me that there should be a qualifier in that chainey [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

jwirr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message

6. It would seem to me that there should be a qualifier in that chainey

statement. A deficit that is run up improving our own country is one thing, one run up fighting useless wars or creating useless military hardware is another. If you spend money on our infrastructure: roads, water projects, education, etc. you have something of use to show for the expenditure. What have we gotten for the money *ss has spent on his wars?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.