Reply #21: ...at getting to the point she is now. She can speak articulately and thoughtfully

[MGKrebs]

about seemingly any issue, much like her husband. Listening to her speak, one can clearly discern that she has "paid attention" and experienced a lot. What difference does it make what specific meetings she was in or not in, or what specific tasks she was given? She is clearly qualified, she clearly has a thorough understanding of how government works, and she is showing the toughness, the stamina, and the will to do the job.

Questioning her experience might make sense if there was any evidence that she might not have the capability to do this job. On the contrary, she often seems more informed, more thoughtful, and more pragmatic than some of her opponents. What difference does it make how she got to this point?