You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Yep, that was contempt - contempt for the intellectually dishonest [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep, that was contempt - contempt for the intellectually dishonest
who claim that Obama is denying coverage for people. Frankly, the people who don't want to be covered will attempt to remain uncovered under both Obama and Clinton. See OP for why I believe Clinton's plan is inadequate.

Blaming Obama? That's a hell of a stretch. People on the right don't like nanny-statism, and people on the left don't like government-sponsored corporatism. Obama created neither of these problems; Clinton walked right into this briar patch on her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC