You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Difference Between Worrying About Right-Wing Smears and Validating Them [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:20 PM
Original message
The Difference Between Worrying About Right-Wing Smears and Validating Them
Advertisements [?]
Saturday, April 12, 2008

Via John Cole, I see that Clinton surrogate Evan Bayh had this to say today about Obama's 'bitter' comment:

“I think it’s a real potential political problem and it’s something for superdelegates and voters to think about,” said Bayh, who was made available to reporters by the Clinton campaign to speak about the controversy.

“The far right wing has a very good track record of using things like this relentlessly against our candidates, whether its Al Gore or John Kerry,” Bayh said, “I’m afraid this is the kind of fodder they might use to harm him.”
This is the classic 'concern troll' type of argument, but it's fair enough. Bayh is undoubtedly right that Republicans will attempt to paint Obama as some sort of effete, elitist snob who is out of touch with regular folk, and they will cite his recent comments as evidence of this. They're already doing it.

But it's important to remember that they will do this with whomever the nominee turns out to be, and they will have no problem finding things to cite as evidence. They do it every single election cycle.

The problem is that Hillary Clinton, the person Evan Bayh is out stumping for, isn't just expressing concern that Republicans will use Obama's comments to attack him unfairly. If that's all she was doing, I wouldn't really have any problem with it. Instead, she's explicitly arguing that Obama is in fact an elitist, out-of-touch snob.

Yesterday she said (referring to Obama): "Pennsylvanians don’t need a president who looks down on them."

In case that wasn't clear enough, today she said: "Senator Obama's remarks are elitist, and they are out of touch. They are not reflective of the values and beliefs of Americans."

That's not just concern trolling. That's flat out validation of the worst Republican-created stereotypes about Democrats. It's hard for me to imagine anything she could say that is more myopic and reckless. Clinton has gone way too far on this one.

http://www.anonymousliberal.com/2008/04/difference-between-worrying-about-right.html

Sent to me by a Friend. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC