You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Clinton White House years - what Obama has to understand [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 11:22 PM
Original message
The Clinton White House years - what Obama has to understand
Advertisements [?]
It is generally accepted that Bill's was a good presidency. The economy expanded across all income level. Yes, Republicans have been saying that this was going to happen anyway, that the recession that caused Bush's loss was already ending, and that the 2001 recession started under Clinton's presidency.

Does not matter. Whoever is seated at the top gets the credit and the blame. After all, the Depression did not end until we fired our manufacturing facilities overtime during WWII.

Bill Clinton was the first Democratic President to be re-elected since FDR and he left the office with the highest approval rating. When he came to office the deficit then was larger than all previous years combined. And he left with a surplus.

So one has to wonder why the Obamas are trashing the "past two decades." Perhaps this is their way to talk to the younger crowd for whom the Clinton administration, not to mention the Reagan/Bush administration, is an old history.

Perhaps this is part of trashing the 60s, even though the Civil Rights movement took place in the 60s, a movement without which there would not be an Obama candidacy.

Perhaps this goes with his praising of Reagan, to show that he dislikes the 60s hoping to attract the "Reagan Democrats" and moderate Republicans.

I have said on these pages before that many women would not vote for Obama because of the way his supporters have been trashing Hillary, personally. Not her campaign, not her track record, but her hair style, her voice, her marriage and, of course, resorting to offensive sexist remarks.

Now I wonder how loyal Democrats, who do remember the Clinton Presidency, would feel if Barack and Michelle continue to trash his Presidency. The irony is that the Newsweek groupies have been saying that Obama is the "heir" of Clinton because of his age, a new generation, etc. I would add because he is married to a professional woman who does not stay home baking cookies. One difference, though, the Clintons in 1992 did not own a million dollar house and their net worth was not even close to the Obamas'

If Barack and Michelle cannot separate Bill the candidate's spouse from Bill the beloved former President - DUers opinion notwithstanding - he could be facing a mass exodus come November.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC