Reply #5: There are more than a few stages of this story, and IF they are to be believed, then

[Ninga]

the conundrum is not who did what to whom, who forgave whom, and who has a right to privacy with a private act......but came to light because our fair Carolinian seems to have created an epilogue......or put another way......the story after the story.

It does not compute with me that he didn't "get it" when it comes to the National Enquire.
A mistake after the mistake is a few too mistakes for me, especially when the National Enquire has made its name by being able to either set up or find the snitch who gives them "round two."


If you and I and the rest of the world are on to the shenanigans of the National Enquire, why make it easy for them by providing an "epilogue"?
It is the story after the story that has allowed the NE to plaster self-righteous headlines and blither on cable TV.

I am so saddened by all of this, just as I was in the 90's with how Clinton dealt with being caught.


I saw a sign some where that said "You won't remember the words or the deeds, but you will remember how they made you feel."