You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Wouldn't a tax on the AIG bonus boobs be Ex Post Facto? Consitutionally shaky?
[View All]
Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 03:40 PM
Original message |
Wouldn't a tax on the AIG bonus boobs be Ex Post Facto? Consitutionally shaky? |
|
I am not opposed to the messagee it sends. ALthough I don't fault the Bonusees nearly as much as the bonusers. But It occurs to me that while it may feel good, it might run afoul of Ex Post Facto language. not to mention prohibition against harsh and unusual punishment.
Just saying. :shrug:
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.