25. Neither spent millions of dollars to defeat Nader they spent millions of dollars to win
Are you so obtuse that you can not see that to win they needed to win as many votes as they could? That they couldn't "let" Nader take the far left without challenging him?
The fact is that Nader could not even articulate a sensible reason for running in 2004 - as he said Kerry was "Presidential" and he respected him. It is pretty hard to label the only Senator to fight BCCI as he did Gore. That and the fact that a lesson was learned in 2000 might be why he got so few votes.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
