You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: They may not be forgeries but they are discredited [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Lucille Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They may not be forgeries but they are discredited
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 04:29 PM by Lucille
If you take Burkett at his word, he destroyed the originals and submitted copies. The copies cannot be authenticated. You cannot analyze paper and ink, or make a definitive judgments about the signature.

Furthermore, Burkett did not have the ability to authenticate the originals. He doesn't even know who gave them to him.

And he admits he lied about other crucial aspects of the memos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC