Reply #6: You most ceretainly CAN bring in prior crimes - especially if the crime is

[seventhson]

part of a conspiracy or a coverup and especially if it shows a pattern or practice of behavior.

Ib this case the crime by Dubya is his partticipation in a continuing criminal enterprise and conspiracy wherein millions were and many more ARE being killed for profit.

I agree that Dubya may not be accountable for treason with the Nazis, but he sure as hell can be accused of treason for his dealings with the Saudis and the Bin Ladens in a joint conspiracy with his father.

The fact that the crimianl entrerpirse goes back to Prescott and Hitler is CERTAINLY admissible evidence in a war crimes, crimes against humanity or a racketeering and conspoiracy prosecution.

Here is the link to the article on Bushes and Nazis:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00....