You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: Giuliani would probably get a a lot of inertia support -- [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #66
70. Giuliani would probably get a a lot of inertia support --
people who are used to voting Republican just pull the lever for him because of the "R" by his name. Would that be enough? In 1976, the current voting pattern hadn't fully set it yet; Carter slipped through a window that was closing, but it didn't fully close until Reagan in 1980. Now, loyalties have hardened. That makes it tough.

That being said,Giuliani is an odd candidate for the Republicans. They run Giuliani, we run Edwards or Warner, maybe Easley, and the South becomes a real battleground, while California would stay blue, and New York either stays blue or becomes a battleground along the lines of Pennsylvania. It would really shake things up, and I like the Democrats' chances when the Republicans can't count on a huge bloc of electoral votes right out of the gates. We have some super talent on our side that is being held back by geography, while the Republicans are so thin talent wise Bush actually looks good to them. Giuliani, with his marital issues, support for abortion and gun control, effectively throws away the cultural issues that drive southern politics, and throws the race to one of personality and voting habits. There, he would win the habit vote, but lose the personality vote. Look at a picture of Giuliani, then one of Edwards or Easley....


Well, my real dream candidate for the Republicans would be Steve Forbes, but that won't happen :/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC