Reply #36: I stand corrected

[Bravo411]

I had originally read that the original leaked document had been retyped, then destroyed to protect the source. Which is no big deal since the original doesn't refer to a singe memo, but is one of many official copies of the document. I have since been made aware that it was photocopied, then returned to the source, and that the copy was then destroyed to protect the source.

I was in no way trying to spread any doubt about the authenticity of the documents. If there was any doubt about their authenticity, then that would have been brought up in Britain during their recent election, which is when the story broke in the Sunday Times. Never has Blair or anybody else in the British government tried to challenge them.