You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: John Anderson, the Nader of 1980 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. John Anderson, the Nader of 1980
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 02:05 AM by autorank
Good for Obama. He can't control who endorses him so this is not a comment on Obama.

1980 Presidential Results

Reagan (R) 43,903,230
Carter (D) 35,480,115
Anderson (I) 5,719,850

Carter had little chance with Anderson's candidacy plus the Iran's illegal and vile behavior of
holding US hostages. Iran holding the hostages through election day was an obvious manipulation of
public opinion against Carter. There was no groundswell for Reagan.

Now here's all you need to know about Mr. John Anderson. After he got nearly 6.0 million votes,
independents/liberal Republicans, he needed a job. Guess who hired him:

The Hoover Institution of Stanford University, nice fat contract.

They've been a right wing apologist front for decades.
Most recently:

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1479

Hoover became an ideas factory for George W. Bush before he was elected president. In the summer of
1999, Bush, then the governor of Texas and in the early stages of his presidential campaign, paid his
first visit to California as a candidate. At the time, Bush's campaign was at pains to portray him as
a moderate, "compassionate" conservative who would soften the hard edges of Republican economic and
social policy. But a few analysts looked beyond the rhetoric to take a closer look at the advisers who
provided the intellectual foundation of his campaign, and in the process saw signs that Bush was not
the post-ideological moderate he appeared to be. The Christian Science Monitor noted that one of the
biggest tipoffs was Bush's close association with the Hoover Institution, which had already "emerged
as the early core of Mr. Bush's brain trust."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC