Reply #11: I liked Edwards and Hillary's is the most similiar. See this link

[demo dutch]

It's this Mandate Muddle.... The fact is the Edwards and Clinton plans contain more money for such subsidies than the Obama plan. Obama's choice not to cover is more of the same
and there is the "stimulating of the economy" which coincides with "universal healthcare"

Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/opinion/07krugman.html?_r=2&n=Top/Opinion/Editorials%20and%20Op-Ed/Op-Ed/Columnists/Paul%20Krugman&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Universal healthcare (Single payer): All Users pay a fee.
Mandate Healthcare with subsidies: All users pay a fee

How do you think "Universal Healthcare" works, or would you rather have no healthcare if your employer doesn't offer it? The fact is in every country that has a universal healthcare proram, the user pays whether in either tax or premium. Overall coverage will force competition and bring prices down.