For example: in NH we had a huge increase in Democratic ballots and Clinton won. So I guess we have to ignore all the states where Clinton won which had open or semi-open primaries and increases in Democratic party participation. Then, once we have carefully cherry-picked our data to match our hypothesis we are left with no actual substantiating evidence of an organized conspiracy other than some viral emails and anecdotes related by disgruntled Clinton supporters. Yes I am sure.
However, given that Obama is polling nationally better than Clinton against McCame, why exactly is the VRWC shooting themselves in the foot like this?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
