You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: I haven't read the book, but what you say doesn't oppose what the prior poster said at all. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. I haven't read the book, but what you say doesn't oppose what the prior poster said at all.
The fact that Hillary may have been ticked that healthcare was being put on the back burner has nothing at all to do with whether she thought NAFTA was a good trade agreement to enter into.

The problem she is having with NAFTA is that she now says it wasn't a good agreement. The problem she is having with NAFTA is NOT that the W.H. didn't also focus on healthcare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC