Reply #29: You 'hope' it isn't true, but you defend it as if it's true?

[PresidentObama]

So what it's detailed. I could produce a detailed account of my affair with Hillary Rodham Clinton, nevermind I have no lick of proof and am gay, but hey...it's detailed. They say they have photographers? So? Where's the photos? This is TWO stories now, and no photos. And they never said they had a photo. Nor a single piece of proof. They claim hotel guests saw the event. Wouldn't they want to quote those guests to give the story life? So what they quoted a hotel employee. Tabloids like National Enquirer have a history of buying off "witnesses" in the past. National Enquirer has no credibility, and is VERY unreliable. Many of the stories, and it's very FEW, that they actually post something factual..it's stories they've gotten details from other sources and other places. All in all, they have a sketchy image as unreliable and not very factual.

Saying (supposedly) you've had a 10 month investigation and providing a detailed story, which could EASILY be made up, doesn't prove anything when they've provided no evidence--NONE.