You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: no because [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. no because
repugs had the power and when they did this reform was strongly stacked for the republicans and everyone knew it. was a ploy like delays redistricting here in texas.

the basis for 527 is ok. it is holding candidate responsible for flat out lie, vs attack or whatever ad. it about says they have to be attack ad, but there is even integrity in this. an honesty in an attack ad. swift bopat was an example of irresponsible and bush accountability is to say no, not right

his bad

dems need 527
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC