You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #38: I think that you must have missed part of my post [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I think that you must have missed part of my post
Edited on Mon May-18-09 12:15 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
I pasted it here so that it stands out a bit:

"Frankly, I'm surprised that some people here are upset that he hasn't fulfilled all of his campaign promises on a lot of issues when he has only been in office nearly four freaking months! It's like some people have completely forgotten that he has had to spend the bulk of his time on economic issues so far but even so he HAS set a lot of things in motion that will, unfortunately take some time to see through to completion. I could understand some people's concern and frustration if we were going on 3-4 years and he was basically sitting on his hands (or taking multiple month long vacations) or if he came out, for example and announced that he now supports maintaining DADT instead of repealing it (which, for the record, I don't believe would ever happen)."

Furthermore, did he ever once pledge to immediately do something about DADT- as soon as he came into office? I don't seem to recall that being something that he pledged to do more or less as soon as he came into office but if you have a link to something I might have missed, I'd be happy to take a look at it. Yeah, I think it's a terrible policy that should've never been enacted and I can't wait to see it repealed but I don't really blame Obama for not making it one of his first/top priorities and never really expected him to. Plus, I'd rather see Congress be the one to change the law so that another wingnut President like W can't come along and easily overturn it with a stroke of his/her pen. Once Congress repeals DADT and by the time somebody comes into office itching to see it repealed, too much time will already have passed and plenty of people will have seen that the military is functioning fine with gays and lesbians serving openly and there simply won't be any impetus for re-instituting DADT or an outright ban absent some kind of theocratic revolution in this country that is simply NOT likely to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC