Reply #29: Sorry, I don't agree: - read the rest of his statement:

[RevCheesehead]

"Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically. I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where-if I knew then what I know now-I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question."
*********
misled on how the source got the papers
would not have gone ahead with story AS IT WAS AIRED

Nowhere does anyone, Dan or CBS, acknowledge these documents are forgeries. More importantly, the content has never been proven to be wrong - from Dan, CBS, or THE WHITE HOUSE. Dan is saying if he knew there were Q's about the source, he would have held off on the story.