You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #84: One, it would draw attention to the claims which they don't want & 2. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #54
84. One, it would draw attention to the claims which they don't want & 2.
Edited on Tue Dec-07-04 03:42 AM by Garbo 2004
even if the election fraud claims were all bogus (just for sake of argument; don't jump me folks, lol), Madsen's, Curtis' and even Fisher's stories touch on some real dirty laundry and sleazy connections that can be documented I think and the names named don't want it aired in the MSM. Civil lawsuits can open a Pandora's Box and discovery can be a bitch. ;)

And if the election fraud claims are hitting too close to the jackpot, well of course that's another very excellent reason to lay low and encourage the MSM not to "dignify" the claims of the "tinfoil hat crowd."

A kill by silence approach. It's worked before. And if the fraud claims gain traction and wider attention, then I figure the smear campaign will roll out.

Remember what they did with Paul O'Neill, Richard Clarke and Joe Wilson. All served in Republican Administrations and were swell respectable fellows...until they broke ranks. Then they were nuts, cranks, partisans, out of the loop, liars, etc. Look what they did to Kerry.

So one can only imagine what will come down on reporters and whistleblowers who don't have that kind of standing. Even if they've got the goods.

The interesting thing is I recall right before and during the election how we were convinced that Kerry was going to win the election. That was to be expected here. But if I recall correctly, from reports here, over in freeperland by election day there was wailing and the gnashing of teeth. Hell...even they appeared to believe Kerry would win. I think a lot of 'em were shocked as we are when the tide seemed to turn all of a sudden.

Now it looks like perhaps even these "tin foil" speculations and reports may be rattling some cages? Or is it the prospect of a very real recount in Ohio and Conyers' little discussion group that some may find threatening? Because maybe a lot of 'em really believed Kerry won and only by the grace of God or Diebold or the dead rising and voting did Bush & Co. retain their grip on power.

Just speculating... :tinfoilhat:

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC