You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: The other problem is that all NINE justices agreed [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. The other problem is that all NINE justices agreed
Very VERY interesting article. Thanks for posting.

The problem with the application of this case is that all nine justices in * v. Gore, including Breyer and Ginsburg, wrote that in one way or the other the Florida Supreme Court had overstepped its bounds.

Seven agreed that something had to be done while two said give them another chance and then Scaley selected * by one vote.

Accordingly, in Bush v. Gore, all nine justices agreed that what the state was doing could not be supported and therefore the balancing of the harm was involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC