You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: They are called "contestees" in the contest of election. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. They are called "contestees" in the contest of election.
Fitrakis said yesterday that today (Monday), Bush, Cheney and Rove would be subpoenaed.

He also told me that his Free Press.org website had recently been hacked.

A few tidbits, if you don't have time to read the whole document:

(Based on the national exit poll results,) "The chance of Kerry receiving a greater percentage of the popular vote than Bush in an honest election was 98.7%." --page 28

p. 29 "Unconstitutional discrimination served as a deliberate provocation which distracted attention from vote fraud needed to control absolutely the outcome of the election. The discrimination served to decrease the vote for candidates Kerry and Connally by an amount which could not be known precisely in advance. The vote fraud served to control precisely in certain critical counties the certified vote for candidates Bush, Cheney, Kerry, Moyer, and Connally by amounts which (when taken in the aggregate) could be known in advance and which would be sufficient to control the outcome of the election."

p. 31 "On information and belief, a second of these means of changing a legitimate result to a fraudulent result included inserting unauthorized and so far undetected operating instructions into the software used to operate either the vote tabulating machines or the voting machines (in the case of direct recording electronic voting machines without a voter verified paper audit trail)...On information and belief the undetected operating instructions were only operational on November 2, 2004."

p. 35 ..."the true result was that the Kerry-Edwards ticket won Ohio by at least 142,537 votes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC