Reply #29: A good possibility is coverup of "default to Bush" setting. So why would

[berniew1]

he volunteer to repeat what he did? If he was doing coverup, he would just come up with a different excuse for what he was doing there. The security was so lax, there is no way to determine what he was doing, other than looking at the votes; but its already known from the pattern of the votes what the fraud was and how it was done in many cases. By setting the electronic machines(touchscreens and optical scans) to default to Bush, which automatically gives him a big boost. The huge amount of reports in the Election Incident Report System(EIRS) has already documented that this occurred, and the methodology confirmed by computer experts.