Olberman dismisses Curtis....but had "Heads Up" from Kerry Lawyer

[KoKo]

Before anyone else was informed of the Kerry filing?

What gives here. Most of us were waiting all day for the Kerry Filing news but according to MSNBC Olberman had the report up just after Noon today...where he "parses" and "nuances" Kerry's attorney...while later trashing Curtis and those of "the few" who e-mailed him about why Curtis' statements have validity.

I'm sick of Olberman playing "Howard Slimeman (Fineman)" games with us.

They stuck Olberman with US and US with him...to get away with NOT having to report anything of value about "Stolen Election 2004!"

Disgusting. :puke:


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240/

December 27, 2004 | 12:11 p.m. ET

Kerry lawyer: does the re-election warrant the public trust? (Keith Olbermann)

NEW YORK - I spent the weekend holding the latest statement from John Kerry’s Ohio attorney up to the light, to see if I could read the secret treasure map written in invisible ink on the other side.

In signing on to the Glibs’ court bid to preserve all the evidence of what has been a severely compromised recount, Daniel Hoffheimer told us at Countdown: “Only then can the integrity of the entire electoral process and the election of Bush-Cheney warrant the public trust.”

Surely, I’m not going out on a limb here to infer that at the moment, Mr. Hoffheimer and the Kerry-Edwards campaign don’t think the entire electoral process and the election of President Bush warrant the public trust.

I mean, the infamous “regardless of the outcome of the election,” phrase in Kerry’s only post-concession comment on the mangled vote was so subtle in both temporality and meaning that it could have been inserted in a statement dealing with any eventuality ranging from a clearly determined vote that was in the past, to a still undecided result.