Reply #7: Will, the statement about Curtis is up under his Dec. 27th post...here's

[KoKo]

the whole quote... Maybe my "browser" is a problem or something...(I'm Netscape not MS-IE)but I went back and checked twice and the "Curtis" comments are attached to his "TODAY-12-27" post on his Blog. :shrug:

Here's the post... about Curtis...just so you know I wasn't using "lying Eyes" here in my post. Check out his Website and scroll through "12/27" and read about Curtis...He trashes him...and gives very little verification for doing so...:shrug:

-------------

Voters and politicians will have to determine if that is an appropriate playing field for political discourse for the next two or four years.

Speaking of discourse, I’ve received a handful of e-mails since I mentioned in passing in last Tuesday’s post, the claims of a Florida computer software worker that he was asked to write a ‘vote-switching program’ in 2000. There have been several points raised that can, I think, be pretty easily cleared up here:

* Several e-mails noted that the programmer, Clint Curtis, testified before the Conyers Voting Forum in Columbus, Ohio, earlier this month. Well, yes and no. He did tell his story there, but it’s instructive to note that he was not asked to do so until after Representative Conyers left the forum, and had turned the chairing of the meeting over to a local politician. This wasn’t a case of Conyers rushing to catch a bus, nor a problem with too many witnesses, nor a coincidence.
* For weeks, say sources at various levels of the formal investigations into the voting irregularities, Mr. Curtis has promised them corroboration of his accusations — even if it was just the statement of someone to whom he said, in 2000, ‘hey, this guy just asked me to write a vote-switching program.’ These sources say they’ve received no such corroboration, and certainly u:levelul>