What is the status of Bev's 'Qui Tam' suit in CA?

[Stephanie]

I haven't heard anything about this for a while. Is it still in process? Anybody know anything?

________________________

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/evoting/2004-09-08-quitam-calif_x.htm

Posted 9/8/2004 3:04 AM Updated 9/8/2004 5:22 PM
California joins electronic voting lawsuit
The Associated Press

California Attorney General Bill Lockyer joined a lawsuit Tuesday alleging that voting equipment company Diebold sold the state shoddy hardware and software, exposing elections to hackers and software bugs.

California's Alameda County also joined the false claims case, originally filed by a computer programmer and voting rights advocate. Faulty equipment in the March primary forced at least 6,000 of 316,000 voters in the county east of San Francisco to use backup paper ballots instead of the paperless voting terminals.

The lawsuit is the first e-voting case to rely on an obscure legal provision for whistleblowers who help the government identify fraud. Programmer Jim March and activist Bev Harris, who first filed the case in November, are seeking full reimbursement for Diebold equipment purchased in California.

Alameda County has spent at least $11 million on paperless touchscreen machines. State election officials have spent at least $8 million.

Because the lawsuit relies on an obscure provision called "qui tam," March and Harris could collect up to 30% of a reimbursement. The state could collect triple damages from Diebold, or settle out of court....

________________________