You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: I would guess no, and here's why. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. I would guess no, and here's why.
There is no tolerance of ambiguity in our government right now. The whole culture has been traumatiszed by the constant hyping of 9/11.

In fact, what the Bush government has done to us post 9/11 out 9/11s 9/11. (Are you following?)

So, there is no way anyone is going for a "provisional" anything at this point.

Bush is most likely in. But, we need to pursue the process anyway, to show the MafiaMajority that we know what the center of the faux "war on terror" really is, a war on our Constitution.

(Ever notice that when the Repugs need something, they declare war on on abstraction?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC