You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #39: Prima facie evidence of fraud...
[View All]
wiggs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-03-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 39. Prima facie evidence of fraud... |
|
... has not been disputed, as far as I know. Warren County lockdown and refusal to allow viewing of poll books elsewhere automatically results an assumption of fraud according to Ohio law. You can't count ballots in secret and you can't withold public records without tainting the election.
There are plenty more reasons to view election integrity as unclear and compromised...and that's all that should need to be shown in order to get investigations going.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread