Reply #98: THE ABOVE POST (#5) IS WHERE - YOU - "ASSUMED" TIA .......

[Not a Sheep]

==============================================================

"We know this is leaked data AND Mitofsky/MSM won't release it."

==============================================================

Those were your words when I simply tried to ask if we knew we had the real data. Sure the data may turn out to be confirmed as legit but you did not know that when you wrote the above statement.

All that you had to say was "we think it is but we don't know, Misofsky won't release the actual data". Instead you said it was leaked data, which we simply do not know. You were wrong and misleading- I'm not going to assume deliberately so tell me.... WHY?

WHY DID I have to keep asking to try and get a straight answer and have everyone attack me when in fact you were telling me something that was wrong and you refused to acknowledge it?

WHY DID you go on a triade below (#80) saying I assume you're biased to Kerry when I never said ANYTHING like that?

WHY DID you say below (#80) that I was the one "jumping to conclusions and making assumptions concerning the data's legitmacy" when I was the one asking if we knew the data was legit? THAT MAKES NO SENSE. It appears you were the one jumping to conclusions and assuming it was legit because you said "We know this is leaked data".

And you called me a bit hypocritical?

You simply refused to acknowledg you were wrong in what you said.. and still do. Instead you attack me. Nice.