Reply #57: You bet it made a difference!!! KICK!

[Peace Patriot]

"That’s 4.6 million more than cast ballots in 2000."

A statistics expert, Steven Freeman, put together what he estimated should have been Kerry's true margin of victory in the election, 5.4 million voters.

He took the Kerry/Bush base vote from 2000, added the new voter registrations (--a blowout for the Dems, Dem 57% to Repub 41%), and added the big bump from Nader and Green voters voting for Kerry. He figured many young people into the new reg category. Even if they registered after "Mosh," it surely influenced them TO vote, once registered.

For Freeman's analysis, see:
http://www.appliedresearch.us/sf/epdiscrep.htm

(His first paper is also great:)
http://www.truthout.org/unexplainedexitpoll.pdf

The new Eminem needs to emphasize fraud and why it happened (that the BushCons--big Bush donors and backers, one of whom, Wally O'Dell, even put in writing his pledge to "deliver" Ohio to Bush in '04--the head of an electronic voting company!) OWN AND CONTROL our voting system, and hold the source code by which all of our votes are counted as SECRET, proprietary information.

BushCons behind the curtain--like the Wizards of Oz--with their secret source code.

Many new and young voters may be very discouraged, and never vote again. They need to know what must be done to regain our right to vote.

Best solution:

Paper ballots
Hand counts

or

A 1st count paper receipt for every vote (it takes priority over electronic results in a recount), and
Open source code!

We also need honest Exit Polls to check for fraud (as they do everywhere else in the world).

---

An aspect of the election that may interest Eminem is that the TV networks ALTERED the Exit Polls that were showing a Kerry win all afternoon. When the BushCon controlled electronic "official results" started coming in, they CHANGED the Exit Polls to fit the "officials results," making it look like Bush was winning both the Exit Polls and the "official results." This was NOT true. Kerry won in the Exit Polls (which are used worldwide to check for fraud).

So Americans were denied the information that there were two conflicting figures--the Exit Polls (Kerry won) and the "official results" (Bush won).

In the Ukraine, people could see the two separate, conflicting figures, and could tell right away that something was very wrong. They rebelled. They got a re-vote.

The TV networks thus KILLED any rebellion of Kerry voters. We "lost" the election and the election fraud fight due to this ILLUSION.

It was the most outrageous journalistic crime I have ever seen, bar none.

They should never have done this! The pollster (Mitosfky) gives the excuse that the Exit Poll was not commissioned (by the networks) to check for election fraud (oh no! not against BushCons, no!), but for demographic information (how many young black women in inner cities voted for Bush, etc.) (ha,ha). But the US had an entirely new and controversial voting system, never tested nationally--and known to be unreliable, insecure, and very hackable, as well as controlled by people committed to Bush's election.

Why DIDN'T they poll for evidence of fraud? The situation cried out for it.

This really is just an excuse on Mitofsky's part--he's trying to explain away why his Exit Poll differed from the "official result" (aside from the obvious explanation--election fraud!). But he ALSO says that there is no reason that the demographic data can't be used to check for fraud!

Also, statistical experts, techies and crazy Leftist bloggers got hold of the afternoon Exit Poll data (which was later changed) by taking screen shots of CNN, etc. They thus preserved the facts about the Kerry win of the Exit Polls--and later got leaked full data. It is analysis of this data which shows astronomical odds against Bush winning. (The Exit Polls simply can't be that wrong--it is virtually impossible.)

It's a great story of smart, alert citizens, being swifter than the networks and catching the BushCons in the act of stealing the election (late in the day).